Skip to content
KCOkurds.global
Your country is not known yet
EN
Sign in Join

proposed · Academy · programme

Peer Review

Every course, guide and standard needs a second reader. This community would run the review protocols for the platform's outputs.

kurds.globalThis programme

Academy · Peer Review · proposed · 4 offers · 4 steps

Academy · programme · proposed

Peer Review

Every course, guide and standard needs a second reader. This community would run the review protocols for the platform's outputs.

Sign in to hear when it opens

On the mapCountrieswhere it forms
Now
Academy128 courses, 128 open for enrolmentCivic3 campaigns, 6 programmesHeritage70 days to keep, 34 chronology entriesNews80 approved sources, no confirmed events yetCommunity Cellsforming. No Chapter is recognised yet
Stateproposed
proposed
verified
Verify, add a source or report
Help check this value

What happens next. A steward reads your note and checks the source. The page changes only after that. You are not named.

What it offers

4
Review protocols

Written steps for reviewing courses, guides and standards.

Reviewer pool

Reviewers across fields, varieties and homeland parts.

Review records

A record of who reviewed what, with interests declared.

Contested topics

Rules for review where sources disagree.

Descriptive only: nothing runs before the state says so.

Who it is for

4 audiences
AcademicsSubject expertsTeachersEditors

How it works

1
Proposal: the community awaits the governing body's decision.
2
Join: reviewers would register their fields and interests.
3
Assign: each output would go to reviewers without a conflict.
4
Record: the outcome would be recorded with the output.

More in Academy

7 programmes
Communities of practice, which the charter calls Standards areas, set shared methods, indicators and protocols. Each one here is a proposal for the governing bo

Key

labels and checks
  • verifiedA figure or claim read at its primary source by a steward or checkers from at least two communities.
  • secondaryA figure or claim cited through a reviewed work rather than read at its primary source.
  • to verifyA figure or claim whose source has not yet been read; it stays in the verification queue.
  • unknownNo source yet. We show unknown, not a guess.
A steward checks the source before anything changes. You are not named.
Formats